I love how NAT and IPV6 are still massively misunderstoodNAT is not a security mechanism Firewalls are Your router still decides what is allowed in with IPV6, and should default to deny incoming connections Only connections you explicitly allow inward should get inWith IPV6 you don’t need NAT, and while the 64/64 split is generally true, there are other setups for subnets out in the wild Not every ISP is gonna give you a /64, some will only give you a single IPV6 address and you’re SOL for anything more As some others have pointed out, getting rid of NAT fixes things for several protocols that have to send data through multiple connections (FTP, SIP/RTP, IRC/DCCP) and makes it so you don’t need to do stupid tricks to find out your public IP address, and trick your router into mapping ports in (STUN protocol)“But NAT hides my internal network structure” – Not really 99 of NAT’ed networks use 19216801 as their gateway thanks to home routers coming with that default Cable Modems & DSL modems have fixed local IPV4 addresses that are pretty easy to guess by ISP, often with default passwords that the user hasn’t got a clue about There have been successful CORS attacks against home routers & cable modems All NAT is giving you is a false sense of security through obscurity
discount prescription drugs canadian online pharmacy priligy kaufen
Valorado en 2 de 5
Urbadyder –
Op Ed There are better, cheaper ways to get Canadians the medicines they need, Financial Post, 11 January 2020 [url=https://fastpriligy.top/]better business bureau online pharmacy priligy[/url]
Stephany Gallimore –
I love how NAT and IPV6 are still massively misunderstoodNAT is not a security mechanism Firewalls are Your router still decides what is allowed in with IPV6, and should default to deny incoming connections Only connections you explicitly allow inward should get inWith IPV6 you don’t need NAT, and while the 64/64 split is generally true, there are other setups for subnets out in the wild Not every ISP is gonna give you a /64, some will only give you a single IPV6 address and you’re SOL for anything more As some others have pointed out, getting rid of NAT fixes things for several protocols that have to send data through multiple connections (FTP, SIP/RTP, IRC/DCCP) and makes it so you don’t need to do stupid tricks to find out your public IP address, and trick your router into mapping ports in (STUN protocol)“But NAT hides my internal network structure” – Not really 99 of NAT’ed networks use 19216801 as their gateway thanks to home routers coming with that default Cable Modems & DSL modems have fixed local IPV4 addresses that are pretty easy to guess by ISP, often with default passwords that the user hasn’t got a clue about There have been successful CORS attacks against home routers & cable modems All NAT is giving you is a false sense of security through obscurity
https://www.healfirstpharma.com/product/fefol-vit-cap/
Johnnie Reuer –
Good artcile, but it would be better if in future you can share more about this subject Keep posting
https://health-first-pharmacy.weeblysite.com/
issuefs –
discount prescription drugs canadian online pharmacy priligy kaufen
Urbadyder –
Op Ed There are better, cheaper ways to get Canadians the medicines they need, Financial Post, 11 January 2020 [url=https://fastpriligy.top/]better business bureau online pharmacy priligy[/url]